About UsCooling TowersScale BanFeedbackContact Us



COMPARISON BETWEEN FORCED DRAUGHT AND INDUCED DRAUGHT COOLING TOWERS

FORCED DRAUGHT
INDUCED DRAUGHT
Apparent Wet Bulb of area Increases:
This is because of the fact that the warm and moist air surrounding the Cooling Tower has the tendency to get sucked in because of the suction of fan. This increases the apparent wet bulb temperature, and the Cooling Tower ceases to give the desired Approach.

No Such thing happens in this case. The air that is thrown out from the top of the Cooling Tower has no chance of getting back into the Cooling Tower. The push of the fan adds to the upward thrust of the warm air.
It can only be square or rectangular shaped:
A Forced draught Cooling Tower always has a fan on the side. Due to this the Cooling Tower cannot be bottle shaped. Further, due to this characteristic the water distribution system cannot be that of a sprinkler form. This results in inefficient water distribution.


The induced draught can be square as well as round. The distribution systems is that of a sprinkler which is considered to be the most efficient water distribution system.
Noise Level:
The noise level in a forced draught Cooling Tower is very high. This is because of the placement of the motor. Since it is placed on the side of the Cooling Tower, it comes with the level of the observer

Noise level is very low, because the fan and motor are placed on the top of the Cooling Tower. They are not in level with the observer
Convertibility:
A forced draught Cooling Tower cannot be a cross flow type model.

An induced draught can be either cross flow or counter flow.
Maintenance:
It is difficult to maintain this type of a Cooling Tower. Because of the inaccessibility of this fills.

The parts of this type of cooling Tower are easily accessible and there is no problem in their maintenance


..Back

Go to Homepage